Intent of the Manual
The intent of this is to provide a full set of distribution forms
that can be used by companies in the
day-to-day administration of their ESOPs.
In our thirty years of administering over 2,000 ESOPs, we have
found that the most difficult task for
the internal personnel who are responsible for the day-to-day administration
of ESOPs is the task of
making distributions in accordance with the original intent of the
plan, and in accordance with the
express terms of the plan document.
The use of proper distribution forms is essential for two reasons.
First, use of the proper forms will
eliminate many of the errors that will otherwise occur if the forms
are not standardized and used
consistently from year to year. Second, use of the proper forms
will leave a complete paper trail in
the event that distribution procedures are subsequently challenged
by the IRS, the DOL or
plan participants.
In profit sharing plans and in 401(k) plans, distributions are
typically made in cash, in a lump sum
amount. Accordingly, distribution procedures and forms used for
these types of plans are relatively
simple. In ESOPs, on the other hand, distribution options include
lump sum cash distributions,
lump sum stock distributions, installment distributions of cash
and installment distributions of
stock. In addition, if the distributions are made in stock, the
company typically has the option of
having these shares repurchased, either by the plan or by the company,
with the further option
of having these repurchases made either in a lump sum or in installments.
Most of these options
are also available in the case of diversification distributions
that are required under Section
401(a)(28) of the Code.
Readers
will notice that many of the Sample Forms Packages relate to the
distribution of plan
benefits in the form of shares of company
stock rather than in the form of cash. Many readers will
wonder why companies would elect to make distributions in shares
of company stock rather than
in cash.
The
reasons for making distributions in the form of shares of company
stock rather than in cash
are twofold.
First,
many companies reach the point in the lifecycle of their plans
where they wish to shrink
their ESOPs. There are only two
ways to shrink an ESOP. The first way is to simply have
the
company repurchase some of the shares directly from the ESOP. This
approach, however,
is dangerous, both from a fiduciary standpoint
and from an operational standpoint.
From a fiduciary standpoint,
any repurchase of company stock by a company from its
ESOP obviously
involves a fiduciary decision for which the fiduciaries can be
held liable if
it is later determined that the repurchase of the
shares was for the benefit of the company and/or
the outside shareholders
rather than for the primary benefit of the ESOP.
Any
repurchase of company stock by a company from its ESOP also involves
possible
transactional liability. That is, if company stock is repurchased
from the
plan, this repurchase is a “transaction” with
a “related party.” Accordingly, the fiduciaries
must comply
with all of the same transactional requirements that apply when
an ESOP
purchases company stock from an outside shareholder. For
example, the transaction should
be documented with a stock purchase
agreement. Also,
if the trustees are also officers
and directors of the company,
there is an inherent conflict of interest involved,
possibly
necessitating the need for an independent fiduciary. Further,
IRS rules and regulations require
that in the case of a sale of
company stock by an ESOP, just as in the case of a purchase
of
company stock by an ESOP, the stock that is involved in the transaction
must be appraised by
an independent appraiser, and the appraisal
opinion must be rendered as of the exact date of
the transaction.
Obviously,
all of these problems and issues can be avoided if the company
shrinks the ESOP on a
gradual basis by making the distributions
in the form of company stock and by having these shares
repurchased
by the company. In this case, the ESOP has not engaged in
any “transaction.” Thus,
fiduciary issues do not come into play.
Also, IRS rules and regulations provide that in the case of
a distribution
of shares of company stock, the participant is permitted to “put” the
shares to the
company (or to the trust) at the appraised fair market
value determined as of the anniversary date
coinciding with or
immediately preceding the date such shares are put. Thus, the regular
year-end
appraisal will suffice for purposes of the “put” option.
It is not necessary to have a separate
appraisal of the exact date
of the shares are put to the company.
The
second reason why ESOPs often elect to make distributions in shares
of company stock rather
than in cash is to enable participants
to take advantage of the favorable tax advantages that are
available
when distributions are made in the form of shares of company stock.
§401(e)(4)(A)
of the Internal Revenue Code provides that where employer securities
are distributed
in a lump sum, the net unrealized appreciation
will not be taxed until the securities are sold or
otherwise disposed
of in a taxable transaction. The net result is that the cumulative
cost basis will
be taxed at ordinary income tax rates, and the
unrealized appreciation will be taxed at long term
capital gains
tax rates when the participant puts the stock back to the trust
or to the company.
Since
the long-term capital gains tax rate is currently 15%, if a participant’s
account balance is
large and if there is substantial appreciation
in the value of the stock, it makes sense to make
distributions
in the form of shares of employer stock rather than in cash, which
will be taxed
entirely
at ordinary income tax rates. By the
same token, in such cases, it usually makes sense
for the participant
to pay the ordinary income tax on the cost basis and capital gains
tax on the
appreciation currently rather than roll over the distribution
to an IRA where the distribution can be
deferred, but will be taxed
entirely at ordinary income tax rates upon eventual distribution.
Please
bear in mind, however, that the capital gains tax on net unrealized
appreciation only applies
to lump sum distributions, i.e. a distribution
of the entire balance of a participant’s account. It does
not apply
to in-service distributions, diversification distributions or required
minimum distributions.
Please also bear in mind
that if the distribution occurs before the participant attains
age 59 1/2,
the 10% excise tax on premature distributions will
also be assessed on the cumulative cost basis
if the participant
elects to receive the distribution and not roll it over to an IRA.
In order to cover all of the options and alternatives that are available under
an ESOP, we have
provided 48 different distribution forms packages. These
forms are in Word format, as well as pdf
format,
so that they can be downloaded and used in the day-to-day administration
of an ESOP
without having to cut and paste from various different
forms. Complete instructions are provided
with each of
the sample forms packages so that the reader will be able to
follow the proper
sequence in preparing these forms.
Back to Top
| Audience
for the Manual
|
|
| This manual
should be useful to a variety of constituencies who are involved
in the administration
of ESOPs, including:
• Internal personnel who are responsible for the day-to-day
operation of an ESOP.
• Third party administrators who are responsible for
the overall coordination
of ESOP administration.
• Trustees, both individual and institutional, who have
the ultimate legal liability for
the proper administration of an ESOP.
• Legal counsel who advise plan sponsors and plan fiduciaries
as to the proper
processing of plan distributions.
• Outside auditors who are required to audit plans to
assure compliance with
ERISA requirements.
We recognize that sample distributions forms cannot cover
every possible distribution scenario.
However, we believe that the forms included in this manual
will cover 95% of the distribution
options that are typically found in an ESOP. We hope that
you will find these sample forms to be
useful, not only in reducing errors in processing distributions,
but also in reducing the time that is
involved in administering your ESOP.
|
|
|